paweld/fpc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source.git synced 2025-08-11 22:46:01 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* give an error instead of a note on the JVM target when overriding a

Browse Source 
method by one with a lower visibility, because calling the overriding
    method results in a java.lang.AbstractMethodError in that case

git-svn-id: trunk@21839 -
This commit is contained in:
Jonas Maebe 2012-07-10 09:20:11 +00:00
parent 8d6557ec35
commit c2be657671
4 changed files with 447 additions and 446 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
compiler/msg/errore.msg
View File

@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ scan_w_unavailable_system_codepage=02091_W_Current system codepage "$1" is not a
#
# Parser
#
# 03321 is the last used one
# 03322 is the last used one
#
% \section{Parser messages}
% This section lists all parser messages. The parser takes care of the
@ -1199,8 +1199,8 @@ parser_e_forward_mismatch=03249_E_Forward type definition does not match
% when being implemented. A forward interface cannot be changed into a class.
parser_n_ignore_lower_visibility=03250_N_Virtual method "$1" has a lower visibility ($2) than parent class $3 ($4)
% The virtual method overrides an method that is declared with a higher visibility. This might give
% unexpected results. In case the new visibility is private than it might be that a call to inherited in a
% new child class will call the higher visible method in a parent class and ignores the private method.
% unexpected results. E.g., in case the new visibility is private then a call to ``inherited'' in a
% new child class will call the higher-visible method in a parent class and ignores the private method.
parser_e_field_not_allowed_here=03251_E_Fields cannot appear after a method or property definition, start a new visibility section first
% Once a method or property has been defined in a class or object, you cannot define any fields afterwards
% without starting a new visibility section (such as \var{public}, \var{private}, etc.). The reason is
@ -1444,6 +1444,8 @@ parser_e_jvm_invalid_virtual_constructor_call=03321_E_Calling a virtual construc
% The JVM does not natively support virtual constructor. Unforunately, we are not aware of a way to
% emulate them in a way that makes it possible to support calling virtual constructors
% for the current instance inside another constructor.
parser_e_method_lower_visibility=03322_E_Overring method "$1" cannot have a lower visibility ($2) than in parent class $3 ($4)
% The JVM does not allow lowering the visibility of an overriding method.
% \end{description}
# Type Checking
#

5
compiler/msgidx.inc
View File

@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ const
parser_d_internal_parser_string=03319;
parser_e_feature_unsupported_for_vm=03320;
parser_e_jvm_invalid_virtual_constructor_call=03321;
parser_e_method_lower_visibility=03322;
type_e_mismatch=04000;
type_e_incompatible_types=04001;
type_e_not_equal_types=04002;
@ -943,9 +944,9 @@ const
option_info=11024;
option_help_pages=11025;
MsgTxtSize = 65908;
MsgTxtSize = 66002;
MsgIdxMax : array[1..20] of longint=(
26,92,322,118,87,56,116,26,202,63,
26,92,323,118,87,56,116,26,202,63,
53,20,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
);

873
compiler/msgtxt.inc
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

7
compiler/nobj.pas
View File

@ -416,7 +416,12 @@ implementation
{ Give a note if the new visibility is lower. For a higher
visibility update the vmt info }
if vmtentryvis>pd.visibility then
MessagePos4(pd.fileinfo,parser_n_ignore_lower_visibility,pd.fullprocname(false),
{$ifdef jvm}
MessagePos4(pd.fileinfo,parser_e_method_lower_visibility,
{$else jvm}
MessagePos4(pd.fileinfo,parser_n_ignore_lower_visibility,
{$endif jvm}
pd.fullprocname(false),
visibilityname[pd.visibility],tobjectdef(vmtpd.owner.defowner).objrealname^,visibilityname[vmtentryvis])
else if pd.visibility>vmtentryvis then
begin