mirror of
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source.git
synced 2025-04-22 13:31:20 +02:00
- 195 which is not a bug
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1bc4581c4
commit
fab0558e0c
@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ begin
|
||||
getmem(p, w);
|
||||
|
||||
{---runtime-error!------}
|
||||
getimage(0,0,111,111, p);
|
||||
{ getimage(0,0,111,111, p); }
|
||||
{-----------------------}
|
||||
|
||||
{ This is the correct usage (PFV) }
|
||||
getimage(0,0,111,111, p^);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
freemem(p, w);
|
||||
closegraph;
|
||||
|
@ -195,11 +195,7 @@ Fixed bugs:
|
||||
bug0166.pp forward type used in declaration crashes instead of error OK 0.99.9 (PFV)
|
||||
bug0167.pp crash when declaring a procedure with same name as object OK 0.99.9 (PFV)
|
||||
bug0168.pp set:=set+element is allowed (should be: set:=set+[element]) OK 0.99.9 (PFV)
|
||||
<<<<<<< readme.txt
|
||||
bug0169.pp missing new(type) support for not object/class OK 0.99.9 (PM)
|
||||
=======
|
||||
bug0169.pp missing new(type) support for not object/class OK 0.99.9 (PM)
|
||||
>>>>>>> 1.86
|
||||
bug0170.pp Asm, {$ifdef} is seen as a separator OK 0.99.9 (PFV)
|
||||
bug0172.pp with with absolute seg:ofs should not be possible OK 0.99.9 (PM)
|
||||
bug0173.pp secondbug is parsed as asm, but should be normal pascalcode OK 0.99.9 (PFV)
|
||||
@ -222,6 +218,9 @@ Fixed bugs:
|
||||
As bug0188 FPC syntax problem see source (PM)
|
||||
bug0192.pp can't compare boolean result with true/false, because the
|
||||
boolean result is already in the flags OK 0.99.11 (PFV)
|
||||
bug0195.pp Problem with Getimage, crash of DOS box, even with dpmiexcp!! (PFV)
|
||||
Not a bug, you must use p^.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Unproducable bugs:
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
@ -260,7 +259,6 @@ bug0190.pp can't have typecast for var params ??
|
||||
bug0191.pp missing vecn constant evaluation
|
||||
bug0193.pp overflow checking for 8 and 16 bit operations wrong
|
||||
bug0194.pp @procedure var returns value in it instead of address !!
|
||||
bug0195.pp Problem with Getimage, crash of DOS box, even with dpmiexcp!!
|
||||
bug0196.pp "function a;" is accepted (should require result type)
|
||||
bug0197.pp should produce an error: problem with c1:=c2<c3 where c? is
|
||||
a comp type
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user