fpc/compiler/pjvm.pas
Jonas Maebe b65422cd59 * make sure that the real name of enums is not replaced by the alias
typesyms we create

git-svn-id: branches/jvmbackend@18647 -
2011-08-20 08:21:05 +00:00

416 lines
18 KiB
ObjectPascal
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{
Copyright (c) 2011 by Jonas Maebe
This unit implements some JVM parser helper routines.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
****************************************************************************
}
{$i fpcdefs.inc}
unit pjvm;
interface
uses
globtype,
symconst,symtype,symbase,symdef,symsym;
{ the JVM specs require that you add a default parameterless
constructor in case the programmer hasn't specified any }
procedure maybe_add_public_default_java_constructor(obj: tabstractrecorddef);
{ records are emulated via Java classes. They require a default constructor
to initialise temps, a deep copy helper for assignments, and clone()
to initialse dynamic arrays }
procedure add_java_default_record_methods_intf(def: trecorddef);
procedure jvm_maybe_create_enum_class(const name: TIDString; def: tdef);
procedure jvm_add_typed_const_initializer(csym: tconstsym);
function jvm_wrap_method_with_vis(pd: tprocdef; vis: tvisibility): tprocdef;
implementation
uses
cutils,cclasses,
verbose,systems,
fmodule,
parabase,aasmdata,
pdecsub,
symtable,symcreat,defcmp,jvmdef,
defutil,paramgr;
{ the JVM specs require that you add a default parameterless
constructor in case the programmer hasn't specified any }
procedure maybe_add_public_default_java_constructor(obj: tabstractrecorddef);
var
sym: tsym;
ps: tprocsym;
pd: tprocdef;
topowner: tdefentry;
i: longint;
sstate: tscannerstate;
needclassconstructor: boolean;
begin
{ if there is at least one constructor for a class, do nothing (for
records, we'll always also need a parameterless constructor) }
if not is_javaclass(obj) or
not (oo_has_constructor in obj.objectoptions) then
begin
{ check whether the parent has a parameterless constructor that we can
call (in case of a class; all records will derive from
java.lang.Object or a shim on top of that with a parameterless
constructor) }
if is_javaclass(obj) then
begin
pd:=nil;
sym:=tsym(tobjectdef(obj).childof.symtable.find('CREATE'));
if assigned(sym) and
(sym.typ=procsym) then
pd:=tprocsym(sym).find_bytype_parameterless(potype_constructor);
if not assigned(pd) then
begin
Message(sym_e_no_matching_inherited_parameterless_constructor);
exit
end;
end;
{ we call all constructors CREATE, because they don't have a name in
Java and otherwise we can't determine whether multiple overloads
are created with the same parameters }
sym:=tsym(obj.symtable.find('CREATE'));
if assigned(sym) then
begin
{ does another, non-procsym, symbol already exist with that name? }
if (sym.typ<>procsym) then
begin
Message1(sym_e_duplicate_id_create_java_constructor,sym.realname);
exit;
end;
ps:=tprocsym(sym);
{ is there already a parameterless function/procedure create? }
pd:=ps.find_bytype_parameterless(potype_function);
if not assigned(pd) then
pd:=ps.find_bytype_parameterless(potype_procedure);
if assigned(pd) then
begin
Message1(sym_e_duplicate_id_create_java_constructor,pd.fullprocname(false));
exit;
end;
end;
if not assigned(sym) then
begin
ps:=tprocsym.create('Create');
obj.symtable.insert(ps);
end;
{ determine symtable level }
topowner:=obj;
while not(topowner.owner.symtabletype in [staticsymtable,globalsymtable]) do
topowner:=topowner.owner.defowner;
{ create procdef }
pd:=tprocdef.create(topowner.owner.symtablelevel+1);
{ method of this objectdef }
pd.struct:=obj;
{ associated procsym }
pd.procsym:=ps;
{ constructor }
pd.proctypeoption:=potype_constructor;
{ needs to be exported }
include(pd.procoptions,po_global);
{ for Delphi mode }
include(pd.procoptions,po_overload);
{ generate anonymous inherited call in the implementation }
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_anon_inherited;
{ public }
pd.visibility:=vis_public;
{ result type }
pd.returndef:=obj;
{ calling convention, self, ... }
handle_calling_convention(pd);
{ register forward declaration with procsym }
proc_add_definition(pd);
end;
{ also add class constructor if class fields that need wrapping, and
if none was defined }
if obj.find_procdef_bytype(potype_class_constructor)=nil then
begin
needclassconstructor:=false;
for i:=0 to obj.symtable.symlist.count-1 do
begin
if (tsym(obj.symtable.symlist[i]).typ=staticvarsym) and
jvmimplicitpointertype(tstaticvarsym(obj.symtable.symlist[i]).vardef) then
begin
needclassconstructor:=true;
break;
end;
end;
if needclassconstructor then
begin
replace_scanner('custom_class_constructor',sstate);
if str_parse_method_dec('constructor fpc_jvm_class_constructor;',potype_class_constructor,true,obj,pd) then
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_empty
else
internalerror(2011040501);
restore_scanner(sstate);
end;
end;
end;
procedure add_java_default_record_methods_intf(def: trecorddef);
var
sstate: tscannerstate;
pd: tprocdef;
begin
maybe_add_public_default_java_constructor(def);
replace_scanner('record_jvm_helpers',sstate);
{ no override, because not supported in records; the parser will still
accept "inherited" though }
if str_parse_method_dec('function clone: JLObject;',potype_function,false,def,pd) then
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_clone
else
internalerror(2011032806);
{ can't use def.typesym, not yet set at this point }
if not assigned(def.symtable.realname) then
internalerror(2011032803);
if str_parse_method_dec('procedure fpcDeepCopy(out result:'+def.symtable.realname^+');',potype_procedure,false,def,pd) then
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_record_deepcopy
else
internalerror(2011032807);
restore_scanner(sstate);
end;
procedure jvm_maybe_create_enum_class(const name: TIDString; def: tdef);
var
arrdef: tarraydef;
arrsym: ttypesym;
juhashmap: tdef;
enumclass: tobjectdef;
pd: tprocdef;
old_current_structdef: tabstractrecorddef;
i: longint;
sym: tstaticvarsym;
fsym: tfieldvarsym;
sstate: tscannerstate;
sl: tpropaccesslist;
temptypesym: ttypesym;
begin
{ if it's a subrange type, don't create a new class }
if assigned(tenumdef(def).basedef) then
exit;
replace_scanner('jvm_enum_class',sstate);
{ create new class (different internal name than enum to prevent name clash) }
enumclass:=tobjectdef.create(odt_javaclass,'$'+name+'$InternEnum',java_jlenum);
tenumdef(def).classdef:=enumclass;
include(enumclass.objectoptions,oo_is_enum_class);
include(enumclass.objectoptions,oo_is_sealed);
{ create an alias for this type inside itself: this way we can choose a
name that can be used in generated Pascal code without risking an
identifier conflict (since it is local to this class; the global name
is unique because it's an identifier that contains $-signs) }
temptypesym:=ttypesym.create('__FPC_TEnumClassAlias',nil);
{ don't pass enumclass to the ttypesym constructor, because then it
will replace the current (real) typesym of that def with the alias }
temptypesym.typedef:=enumclass;
enumclass.symtable.insert(temptypesym);
{ also create an alias for the enum type so that we can iterate over
all enum values when creating the body of the class constructor }
temptypesym:=ttypesym.create('__FPC_TEnumAlias',nil);
temptypesym.typedef:=def;
enumclass.symtable.insert(temptypesym);
{ but the name of the class as far as the JVM is concerned will match
the enum's original name (the enum type itself won't be output in
any class file, so no conflict there) }
enumclass.objextname:=stringdup(name);
{ now add a bunch of extra things to the enum class }
old_current_structdef:=current_structdef;
current_structdef:=enumclass;
symtablestack.push(enumclass.symtable);
{ create static fields representing all enums }
for i:=0 to tenumdef(def).symtable.symlist.count-1 do
begin
sym:=tstaticvarsym.create(tenumsym(tenumdef(def).symtable.symlist[i]).realname,vs_final,enumclass,[]);
enumclass.symtable.insert(sym);
{ alias for consistency with parsed staticvarsyms }
sl:=tpropaccesslist.create;
sl.addsym(sl_load,sym);
enumclass.symtable.insert(tabsolutevarsym.create_ref('$'+internal_static_field_name(sym.name),enumclass,sl));
end;
{ create local "array of enumtype" type for the "values" functionality
(used internally by the JDK) }
arrdef:=tarraydef.create(0,tenumdef(def).symtable.symlist.count-1,s32inttype);
arrdef.elementdef:=enumclass;
arrsym:=ttypesym.create('__FPC_TEnumValues',arrdef);
enumclass.symtable.insert(arrsym);
{ insert "public static values: array of enumclass" that returns $VALUES.clone()
(rather than a dynamic array and using clone --which we don't support yet for arrays--
simply use a fixed length array and copy it) }
if not str_parse_method_dec('function values: __FPC_TEnumValues;',potype_function,true,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062301);
include(pd.procoptions,po_staticmethod);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_values;
{ do we have to store the ordinal value separately? (if no jumps, we can
just call the default ordinal() java.lang.Enum function) }
if tenumdef(def).has_jumps then
begin
{ add field for the value }
fsym:=tfieldvarsym.create('__fpc_fenumval',vs_final,s32inttype,[]);
enumclass.symtable.insert(fsym);
tobjectsymtable(enumclass.symtable).addfield(fsym,vis_strictprivate);
{ add class field with hash table that maps from FPC-declared ordinal value -> enum instance }
juhashmap:=search_system_type('JUHASHMAP').typedef;
sym:=tstaticvarsym.create('__fpc_ord2enum',vs_final,juhashmap,[]);
enumclass.symtable.insert(sym);
{ alias for consistency with parsed staticvarsyms }
sl:=tpropaccesslist.create;
sl.addsym(sl_load,sym);
enumclass.symtable.insert(tabsolutevarsym.create_ref('$'+internal_static_field_name(sym.name),enumclass,sl));
{ add custom constructor }
if not str_parse_method_dec('constructor Create(const __fpc_name: JLString; const __fpc_ord, __fpc_initenumval: longint);',potype_constructor,false,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062401);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_jumps_constr;
pd.visibility:=vis_strictprivate;
end
else
begin
{ insert "private constructor(string,int,int)" that calls inherited and
initialises the FPC value field }
add_missing_parent_constructors_intf(enumclass,vis_strictprivate);
end;
{ add instance method to get the enum's value as declared in FPC }
if not str_parse_method_dec('function FPCOrdinal: longint;',potype_function,false,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062402);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_fpcordinal;
{ add static class method to convert an ordinal to the corresponding enum }
if not str_parse_method_dec('function FPCValueOf(__fpc_int: longint): __FPC_TEnumClassAlias; static;',potype_function,true,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062402);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_fpcvalueof;
{ insert "public static valueOf(string): tenumclass" that returns tenumclass(inherited valueOf(tenumclass,string)) }
if not str_parse_method_dec('function valueOf(const __fpc_str: JLString): __FPC_TEnumClassAlias; static;',potype_function,true,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062302);
include(pd.procoptions,po_staticmethod);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_valueof;
{ create array called "$VALUES" that will contain a reference to all
enum instances (JDK convention)
Disable duplicate identifier checking when inserting, because it will
check for a conflict with "VALUES" ($<id> normally means "check for
<id> without uppercasing first"), which will conflict with the
"Values" instance method -- that's also the reason why we insert the
field only now, because we cannot disable duplicate identifier
checking when creating the "Values" method }
sym:=tstaticvarsym.create('$VALUES',vs_final,arrdef,[]);
sym.visibility:=vis_strictprivate;
enumclass.symtable.insert(sym,false);
{ alias for consistency with parsed staticvarsyms }
sl:=tpropaccesslist.create;
sl.addsym(sl_load,sym);
enumclass.symtable.insert(tabsolutevarsym.create_ref('$'+internal_static_field_name(sym.name),arrdef,sl));
{ alias for accessing the field in generated Pascal code }
sl:=tpropaccesslist.create;
sl.addsym(sl_load,sym);
enumclass.symtable.insert(tabsolutevarsym.create_ref('__fpc_FVALUES',arrdef,sl));
{ add initialization of the static class fields created above }
if not str_parse_method_dec('constructor fpc_enum_class_constructor;',potype_class_constructor,true,enumclass,pd) then
internalerror(2011062303);
pd.synthetickind:=tsk_jvm_enum_classconstr;
symtablestack.pop(enumclass.symtable);
current_structdef:=old_current_structdef;
restore_scanner(sstate);
end;
procedure jvm_add_typed_const_initializer(csym: tconstsym);
var
ssym: tstaticvarsym;
esym: tenumsym;
i: longint;
sstate: tscannerstate;
begin
case csym.constdef.typ of
enumdef:
begin
replace_scanner('jvm_enum_const',sstate);
{ make sure we don't emit a definition for this field (we'll do
that for the constsym already) -> mark as external }
ssym:=tstaticvarsym.create(internal_static_field_name(csym.realname),vs_final,csym.constdef,[vo_is_external]);
csym.owner.insert(ssym);
{ alias storage to the constsym }
ssym.set_mangledname(csym.realname);
for i:=0 to tenumdef(csym.constdef).symtable.symlist.count-1 do
begin
esym:=tenumsym(tenumdef(csym.constdef).symtable.symlist[i]);
if esym.value=csym.value.valueord.svalue then
break;
esym:=nil;
end;
{ can happen in case of explicit typecast from integer constant
to enum type }
if not assigned(esym) then
begin
MessagePos(csym.fileinfo,parser_e_range_check_error);
exit;
end;
str_parse_typedconst(current_asmdata.asmlists[al_typedconsts],esym.name+';',ssym);
restore_scanner(sstate);
end
else
internalerror(2011062701);
end;
end;
function jvm_wrap_method_with_vis(pd: tprocdef; vis: tvisibility): tprocdef;
var
obj: tabstractrecorddef;
visname: string;
begin
obj:=current_structdef;
{ if someone gets the idea to add a property to an external class
definition, don't try to wrap it since we cannot add methods to
external classes }
if oo_is_external in obj.objectoptions then
begin
result:=pd;
exit
end;
result:=tprocdef(pd.getcopy);
result.visibility:=vis;
visname:=visibilityName[vis];
replace(visname,' ','_');
{ create a name that is unique amongst all units (start with '$unitname$$') and
unique in this unit (result.defid) }
finish_copied_procdef(result,'$'+current_module.realmodulename^+'$$'+tostr(result.defid)+pd.procsym.realname+'$'+visname,obj.symtable,obj);
{ in case the referred method is from an external class }
exclude(result.procoptions,po_external);
{ not virtual/override/abstract/... }
result.procoptions:=result.procoptions*[po_classmethod,po_staticmethod,po_java,po_varargs,po_public];
result.synthetickind:=tsk_callthrough;
{ so we know the name of the routine to call through to }
result.skpara:=pd;
end;
end.